Skip to content
  • Media Downloads
Donate
  • Donate
  • logo
  • logo
  • About the Center
    • About us
    • What we do
    • The Trust Project
    • Staff
    • Former interns and fellows: Where they are now
    • Board of Directors
    • Awards and honors
    • Funding
    • Public engagement and opinion
    • Republishing guidelines
    • Be your own watchdog
    • Subscribe to our email newsletters
    • Donate
    • Contact us
  • Contact
  • Subscribe to newsletters
  • Become a member
    • Learn more about membership
    • Join the Watchdog Club
  • Coverage areas
    • Economy
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Justice System
    • Health
    • Opinion
  • Projects
    • Seeking a Cure: The Quest to Save Rural Hospitals
    • The Cannabis Question
    • Beyond Bail
    • Undemocratic: Secrecy and Power vs. The People
    • Countering Concussions
    • Broken Whistle
    • Failure at the Faucet
    • Documenting Hate
    • Flawed Forensics
    • State of Change
    • Cruel and Unusual?
    • Precious Lives
    • Children Left Behind
    • Scott Walker’s Wisconsin
    • Frac Sand Rush
    • Murky Waters
    • Water Watch Wisconsin
    • Losing Track
    • Groundwater Supply
    • A Frail System
    • Endocrine Disruptors
    • Rethinking Sex Offenders
    • Rural Slide
  • Be your own watchdog
  • Donate
  • Media Downloads
    • Media Downloads

WisconsinWatch.org - Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism

WisconsinWatch.org (https://www.wisconsinwatch.org/2012/03/how-the-justices-see-it/)

  • About the Center
    • About us
    • What we do
    • The Trust Project
    • Staff
    • Former interns and fellows: Where they are now
    • Board of Directors
    • Awards and honors
    • Funding
    • Public engagement and opinion
    • Republishing guidelines
    • Be your own watchdog
    • Subscribe to our email newsletters
    • Donate
    • Contact us
  • Contact
  • Subscribe to newsletters
  • Become a member
    • Learn more about membership
    • Join the Watchdog Club
  • Coverage areas
    • Economy
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Justice System
    • Health
    • Opinion
  • Projects
    • Seeking a Cure: The Quest to Save Rural Hospitals
    • The Cannabis Question
    • Beyond Bail
    • Undemocratic: Secrecy and Power vs. The People
    • Countering Concussions
    • Broken Whistle
    • Failure at the Faucet
    • Documenting Hate
    • Flawed Forensics
    • State of Change
    • Cruel and Unusual?
    • Precious Lives
    • Children Left Behind
    • Scott Walker’s Wisconsin
    • Frac Sand Rush
    • Murky Waters
    • Water Watch Wisconsin
    • Losing Track
    • Groundwater Supply
    • A Frail System
    • Endocrine Disruptors
    • Rethinking Sex Offenders
    • Rural Slide
  • Be your own watchdog
wisconsin supreme court

How the justices see it

By Bill Lueders Bill Lueders | March 10, 2012

Wisconsin’s Supreme Court justices divide sharply on the recusal issue. Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson and Justices Ann Walsh Bradley and Patrick Crooks have sought stricter standards, while Justices David Prosser, Patience Roggensack, Annette Ziegler and Michael Gableman have voted to let judges take part in cases involving campaign supporters and against allowing a court majority to force a justice’s removal.

David Prosser

“Because the preservation of the court as an institution is more important than any case or any member of the court, I believe we must reject the notion that we possess the power to prevent each other from participating in individual cases.”

— Feb. 11, 2010 opinion in State v. Allen


Patrick Crooks

“Amending the statute to include a true objective standard would ensure that when a recusal motion is brought based on a judge’s having received campaign contributions, the motion would be evaluated under an objective test rather than the judge’s subjective determination.”

— Sept. 16, 2010 testimony to a Legislative Council committee


Patience Roggensack

“It is the fundamental right of each elector to cast an effective vote for the office of judge. When an unbiased judge is removed from hearing a case or cases by the operation of recusal rules, the recusal defeats the votes of the electorate that were cast for that unbiased judge.”

— Sept. 7, 2010 testimony to a Legislative Council committee


Shirley Abrahamson

“I am disappointed that my colleagues on the Supreme Court do not come back to the table to reconsider amending the Code of Judicial Conduct in light of (recent developments regarding recusal). … The time has come to beef up the safeguards that keep our justice system secure.”

— Sept. 16, 2010 testimony to a Legislative Council committee


Annette Ziegler

“The writings of Chief Justice Abrahamson and Justice Crooks (would potentially allow) an attack on virtually any justice for any reason and allow litigants to ‘pick their court’ by filing recusal motions against certain justices and not others.”

— Feb. 11, 2010 opinion in State v. Allen


Ann Walsh Bradley

“If this court is unwilling or unable to keep its own house in order, perhaps it will require action by others to step in and assist in maintaining the integrity of the court and preserving the public trust and confidence that Wisconsin judges will be impartial.”

— July 7, 2010 dissent to Supreme Court’s revision of its recusal rules


Michael Gableman

“As with the U.S. Supreme Court, (in Wisconsin) there is no one to replace a justice on our court who recuses himself or herself from a case. A justice simply should not withdraw from a case because of ‘partisan demands, public clamor or considerations or personal popularity or notoriety.’ ”

— Jan. 20, 2012 order rejecting recusal requests

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
X

Republish this article

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are welcome to republish our articles for free using the following ground rules.

  • Credit should be given, in this format: “By Dee J. Hall, Wisconsin Watch”
  • If published online, you must include the links from the Wisconsin Watch story, and a link to wisconsinwatch.org
  • If you share the story on social media, please mention @wisconsinwatch (Twitter, Facebook and Instagram)
  • Don’t sell the story — that is, the story may not be marketed as an individual product.
  • Don’t sell ads against the story. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
  • Any website our stories appear on must include a prominent and effective way to contact you.
  • If we send you a request to change or remove Wisconsin Watch content from your site, you must agree to do so immediately.
  • Sources of any additional elements that are packaged with Wisconsin Watch content must be clearly labeled.
  • When possible, include the following: Wisconsin Watch is a nonprofit, nonpartisan investigative reporting organization that focuses on government integrity and quality of life issues in Wisconsin.
  • Users can republish our photos, illustrations, graphics and other multimedia elements ONLY with the stories with which they originally appeared. You may not separate any multimedia element from the story for standalone use. 

For questions regarding republishing rules please contact Andy Hall, executive director, at ahall@wisconsinwatch.org

How the justices see it

by Bill Lueders, WisconsinWatch.org
March 10, 2012

1

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

About Bill Lueders

Bill Lueders

Bill Lueders was reporter, editor and Money and Politics Project director for the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism from 2011 to 2015.

  • More by Bill

Support WisconsinWatch.org

The Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism is a nonprofit organization. If you value our work, please help support it.

Donate
The nonprofit Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism (www.WisconsinWatch.org) collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.

Read This Next

  • Ain’t nobody’s business but their own?

    Wisconsin’s Supreme Court justices are sharply split — not just on when they should not take part in a given case, but even over whether the court has the authority to make such calls.

    Share this:

    • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

The Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism is a nonprofit organization.

If you value our work, please help support it.

Donate
  • Topics
    • Economy
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Health
    • Justice System
  • Projects
    • Seeking a Cure
    • The Cannabis Question
    • Beyond Bail
    • Undemocratic
    • Countering Concussions
    • Failure at the Faucet
    • Broken Whistle
    • Flawed Forensics
    • Losing Track
    • Cruel and Unusual?
    • Children Left Behind
    • Precious Lives
    • Frac Sand Rush
    • A Frail System
    • Endocrine Disruptors
    • Rethinking Sex Offenders
    • Rural Slide
    • Dairyland Diversity
  • About the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism
    • What we do
    • Awards and honors
    • Republishing guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Diversity
    • Funding
    • Pitch guidelines for freelancers
    • Corrections and clarifications
    • Media downloads
    • Newsletter archives
  • Our People
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Journalism Advisory Board

Our Mission

To increase the quality, quantity and understanding of investigative journalism to foster an informed citizenry and strengthen democracy.

  • Our Impact
    • Track our stories
    • Stories making a difference
Contact

Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism
Fifth Floor, Vilas Hall
821 University Ave
Madison, WI 53706

608-262-3642

info@wisconsinwatch.org

Send Us A Tip

Search This Site

Browse Archives

© Copyright 2019, Wisconsin Watch from WisconsinWatch.org

WisconsinWatch.org is a member of the Institute for Nonprofit News

Built with the Largo WordPress Theme from the Institute for Nonprofit News.

Back to top ↑

Cancel