Bill would limit local control of frac sand mining

Communities ‘trying to establish mini-DNRs,’ Sen. Tiffany says

On the radio

Listen to Center reporter Tegan Wendland’s Wisconsin Public Radio version of this story.

More frac sand coverage

Explore the Center’s frac sand project page.

By Alison Dirr and Tegan Wendland
Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism

Two Republican state lawmakers are sponsoring a bill to restrict the ability of local communities to regulate Wisconsin’s booming frac sand industry.

The draft bill, now being circulated for cosponsors by Sen. Tom Tiffany, R-Hazelhurst, and Rep. Joan Ballweg, R-Markesan, would bar local governments from regulating some aspects of nonmetallic mining, including its impacts on air quality, water, road use and reclamation.

In an email sent to fellow lawmakers on Wednesday, Tiffany said local governments can discriminatorily impose restrictions, which “creates an arbitrary and uncertain regulatory climate for the nonmetallic mining industry.”

He added, “It discourages future investment and threatens existing operations.”

Sen. Tom Tiffany

Tiffany told the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism on Thursday that some local units of government are “trying to establish mini-DNRs” — for instance, by doing their own air and water testing. “That’s the purview of the state. The environmental regulator for the state of Wisconsin for air and water quality is the Department of Natural Resources, not local entities.”

Tiffany hopes the Senate’s committee on Workforce Development, Forestry, Mining and Revenue, which he chairs, can hold a hearing on the bill next Thursday. He does not think the bill is moving too fast, saying he unveiled it “eight days ahead of time.”

Wisconsin is the nation’s No. 1 producer of sand used in fracking, a process used to extract oil and natural gas. There are currently at least 115 permitted or operational frac sand mines and processing plants in the state.

Richard Shearer, president and CEO of the Texas-based Superior Silica Sands, recently declared that “Wisconsin is the global epicenter” of the frac sand mining boom, “and we’re just getting started.”

Currently, control over different parts of the mining process, from day-to-day operations to long-term reclamation plans, can be divided between many levels of government.

Sen. Kathleen Vinehout

The proposed bill restricts local governments’ authority over roads and traffic and the use of explosives, as well as their ability to regulate air or water quality related to nonmetallic mines. It would also prohibit the DNR from establishing nonmetallic mining reclamation standards relating to water quality or air quality that are more restrictive than existing state laws.

In some cases, Tiffany said, the bill would allow mining companies to renegotiate existing agreements with local governments.

But the lead sponsors say in their memo that it will not end the ability of local governments to prohibit nonmetallic mining or “lessen the stringent regulatory standards on siting and operating” these mines.

Sen. Kathleen Vinehout, D-Alma, has introduced bills, which have not advanced, to increase regulatory controls over frac sand operations. In an interview, she called the new bill “another example of legislation happening in Wisconsin in the state Capitol that is being driven by out-of-state corporate interests that takes away local people’s ability to protect their health, their safety, and their neighborhood.”

Tiffany dismissed Vinehout’s criticisms as “just rhetoric.”

Eau Claire attorney Glenn Stoddard, who has represented parties suing frac sand companies, ripped the bill as “an obvious giveaway to the frac sand industry.” He wrote in an email that the bill “essentially takes away all meaningful regulatory authority of local and county governments to protect the public from the adverse environmental and public health impacts of frac sand mining.”

Rick Stadelman, executive director of the Wisconsin Towns Association, said taking away licensing agreements, which give communities the power to force companies to negotiate, could backfire on the industry.

“There is going to be potentially more backlash against these sites from neighbors who feel the state has not given them even a voice in this process,” Stadelman said.

He added that the growing number of facilities is evidence that current licensing ordinances and zoning have not hindered industry growth.

John Behling, an attorney from law firm Weld, Riley, Prenn & Ricci in Eau Claire, who represents clients in the frac sand industry, said a “complex regulatory environment” is not new to industry, and companies must figure out how to navigate it.
On Aug. 30, Trempealeau County in western Wisconsin instituted a moratorium prohibiting the permitting of additional frac sand facilities, citing the need to study potential health effects stemming from air quality.

In neighboring Minnesota, the city of Winona is looking into monitoring air quality to protect its residents.

The nonprofit Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism ( collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication.

All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Pin it on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare via email

Related posts:

Tags: , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Bill would limit local control of frac sand mining”

  1. Constance says:

    Really Senator Vinehout – you clamor for local control NOW???? You stood by and did nothing to help us regain local control for industrial wind turbine siting. You listened to my neighbors’ testimony about having to abandon the homes they still own own to regain their health and you did NOTHING! This new policy of yours is so two faced it makes me sick. People in my neighborhood continue to suffer each and every day and politicians do nothing…..except to say ‘prove it’. Democrats AND Republicans have stood by and done nothing – I agree that local control is ESSENTIAL to protect health and safety – isn’t time that you took that stance CONSISTENTLY across all issues that that can ROB families’ health and safety?? Senator Vinehout – the time is NOW.

  2. Sandi says:

    I am one of many WI rural people now impacted by frac sand mining. I ALSO am one of many WI rural people who’ve been threatened by irresponsible siting of wind farms because of loss of local control. Looks like Madison is planning to throw me under the bus again. BOTH of these are LOCAL issues – both impact me in the same ways. I PRAISE Sen Vinehout’s current fight FOR local control over mine siting in my area. I CONDEMN Sen Vinehout’s past fight AGAINST local control over wind farm siting. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE. Enough of the double mindedness, please, Senator. Both create social injustices in which the victims have no recourse and lose in big ways. Please also fight to stop the ongoing victimization of taxpayers by wind farms.


  1. [...] Sen. Tom Tiffany, R-Hazelhurst, has introduced legislation that would limit the ability of local governments to regulate some aspects of frac sand mining. The [...]

  2. [...] Bill would limit local control of frac sand mining Oct. 17, 2013 Frac sand health fears rise as mining booms in Wisconsin [...]

  3. [...] Bill would limit local control of frac sand mining – [...]

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated. Please keep your comments respectful and on topic.

Follow us on Twitter: @WisWatch

View our newsletter archives.