Bills to keep an eye on

By Bill Lueders

Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism


Bill Lueders, Money and Politics Project director

Anybody with Internet access can do it.

Just go to the Wisconsin State Legislature’s web page,, and click “Legislation” on the left. A couple more clicks will lead you to lists of bills introduced in the current session, which runs through 2014.

The text and history of each bill are also within clicking distance.

Now comes the fun part. The menu option “Bill notification” lets visitors sign up for emails whenever any particular bill has a hearing, fiscal estimate or vote.

There is always more happening in the Legislature than any person can track or every media outlet can cover. Civic groups may want to “Adopt a bill,” like they might a stretch of highway.

Here, on the money and politics beat, are some of the bills we’ve asked to be notified about:

Assembly Bill 5 and its companion, Senate Bill 34, would expand existing sales and property tax exemptions for television and radio stations, for things like transmitters and vehicles. The state Department of Revenue estimates a $2.2 million annual decrease in sales tax and use revenues, and a shift of between $1 million to $2.1 million to other property taxpayers.

The bill, one of many over the years that have shifted state tax burdens, has mostly Republican cosponsors. But it’s also backed by state Rep. Brett Hulsey, D-Madison, who told the Wisconsin State Journal he signed on because “the TV and radio stations in my district asked me to.”

On the lobby front (click “Government Accountability Board information”), the cities of Madison and Milwaukee have registered in opposition; the Wisconsin Broadcasters Association has registered in support.

AB 19 and SB 13 would, like prior “tort reforms,” raise the bar for people who want to sue. It creates new procedures and requirements for personal injury claims.

A fiscal estimate released April 4 — the email notification went out the next day — concluded that these rules would have applied to 6,350 Wisconsin circuit court actions last year. The fiscal impact was “Indeterminant.”

The bill, sponsored by Republicans, is shaping up to be a lobbying lollapalooza. Eleven groups including the business lobby Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce have registered in favor; five groups including the Wisconsin Association of Justice, representing trial lawyers, are opposed.

AB 83 and SB 71 is a GOP-led effort to let local governments impose tougher restrictions on wind-energy systems than those set by the state. It’s similar to past legislative efforts blamed for keeping wind power projects, and jobs, from coming to Wisconsin.

The bill is opposed by some environmental groups, unions and General Electric. Supporters include the Wisconsin Realtors Association, Wisconsin Counties Association and Wisconsin Towns Association.

Also in favor is the Coalition For Wisconsin Environmental Stewardship, “a statewide grassroots organization” that has managed to pay a contract lobbyist more than $150,000 since 2008. You could look it up.

AB 8, introduced by Republicans, would sharply limit the ability of local governments to forbid hunting with a bow and arrow or crossbow within their jurisdictions. And it would exempt arrow flingers from the current statutory ban on hunting within 1,700 feet of a hospital, sanatorium or school.

A similar bill was introduced last session but failed to pass, despite a favorable committee vote. It was backed by the National Rifle Association, Wisconsin Bear Hunters Association, Wisconsin Bowhunters Association and Safari Club International, among others.

Some of these same hunting groups last year helped pass a bill that, as amended, opened state parks to hunting and trapping. Opponents included the Madison Audubon Society, the Nature Conservancy and Wisconsin State Horse Council.

This session, Democrats have introduced SB 17 to undo this requirement. The bill would restrict hunting and ban trapping in state parks. No supporters or opponents have yet registered.

If and when they do, the state’s legislative website will be keeping track.


Bill Lueders is the Money and Politics Project director at the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism ( The project, a partnership of the Center and MapLight, is supported by the Open Society Institute.

The Center collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.



Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Pin it on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare via email

Related posts:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Bills to keep an eye on”

  1. Fred Olsen says:

    RE: the wind power bills

    So totally the same old false dichotomy– Choose industrial wind owned by the power companies, or choose nothing.

    We could be choosing small scale user-owner wind power. We crush and melt down perfectly good automobile electric charging systems every day that would be suitable for use on small wind generators. Small is good. No bird kill, no vibration or electrical interference problems, no regulatory costs, no light and shadow problems…. And best of all, the power company doesn’t own the wind– WE DO.

    If you want to be any kind of watchdog, you need to be watching for action by utilities and their lapdog media and pols– legislation that would outlaw or make it difficult to impossible for small-scale user-owner power to survive.

    Cheap, decentralized power owned by the people would drastically negatively affect big utilities and their friends.

    The white elephant giant windmills owned by the power companies will be hammered by increasingly lower photovoltaic costs and other energy alternatives.

    Right now through Amazon dot com I can buy 100 watts of photovoltaic power for $159. The price will continue going lower— even with the drop in the value of the dollar. I’ll be buying that and kissing the power company goodbye.

    What happens when a thirty year amortization investment in giant windmills becomes a very crappy investment, because the price of making electricity another way is undercutting it? Will the state allow the power companies to pass along the costs of this bad investment to ratepayers? Does a bear eliminate solid waste in the woods? Is the squeaking Pope catholic?

    That’s real focking money (God bless Ed Kumbalek), not some piddly half a mil (over many years to boot) that certain folks are wetting their pants about hunting dog reimbursements.

    I’d be real happy if your center for IJ would investigate the big money expenditures. Highways. Other padded construction projects. The two territories of highway construction business in Wisconsin.

    I’d be real happy if you’d investigate just why it is that it’s legal to send Wisconsin National Guard (or other military) to fight in wars provably based on lies.

    I’d be real happy if you’d investigate why WPR covered up the criminal bankers’ settlement with the WI AG and who benefited…. or why they censor the host of important topics they do.

    I got a whole list if you want more. Real journalist meat.

    What you do I consider to be ordinary every day commercial teevee station or weekly newspaper journalism. Nothing wrong with it. It’s only when you you try to say it’s something more or special.

    Go after the social crimes in plain sight. Go after the political crimes in plain sight. Go for the big stuff. Put high-buck thieving, lying murderous scum in jail.

    Catch a foreign spy. More than a few in town. You know at least one, I’m sure…. just as you know “journalists” who double as government informers and story-planters for our patriotic propaganda machine.

    Be a Seymour Hersch, not an Ari Fleisher.


Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated. Please keep your comments respectful and on topic.

Follow us on Twitter: @WisWatch

View our newsletter archives.